Stop the Daintree River Bridge

A bridge over the Daintree River will cause irreversible damage to World Heritage values and will fuel further development along the Daintree coast. Thousands of people have added their voice to calls to urgently stop this bridge.

Daintree River - by Steven Nowakowski

The Daintree is the jewel in Far North Queensland’s tourism crown. Cape Tribulation, at its northern end, is a popular destination for tourists – both Australian and international. Crossing the Daintree River to get there is a rite of passage for many tourists.

Currently, the only way to reach the Daintree from the south is by vehicular barge across the Daintree River. For a small number of days every year there is a queue to cross the river. Locals don’t have to queue as they have special access to a fast lane to avoid delays.

The local authority, Douglas Shire Council is now exploring options for a bridge over the Daintree River. According to Council, a bridge could cost up to $75 million and people would still need to pay a toll to cross. Neither State nor Federal Government has indicated financial support for a bridge.

In comparison, a second ferry, which has been fully costed and already opened to tenders, would cost less than $3 million to establish and then turn a profit.

A bridge may create jobs but only during construction and mostly for people in neighbouring regions. 30 local employees operating the current and potential second ferry would lose jobs once the ferry was decommissioned. Council has stated that it has not considered job losses in its deliberations.

It’s not just the financial cost that has alarmed Rainforest4 supporters across the globe as well as local conservationists and residents.

The Daintree River Crossing Options Report, prepared by two engineers on staff at Douglas Shire Council focuses only on technical and financial considerations and does not include environment, social, economic or cultural heritage implications of a proposed bridge.

According to David Attenborough, the Daintree is “the most extraordinary place on Earth.”  

It’s the only place on the globe where two World Heritage sites exist side-by-side. In the Daintree, the rainforest meets the sea, supporting an ancient landscape that contains the oldest plants on the planet – some of them twice as old as Tyrannosaurus Rex.  

The rainforests of the Daintree represent the largest area of lowland rainforest in Australia, with an area sufficiently large to ensure ongoing evolutionary and ecological processes despite 120 million years of climate and geological change.

The Endangered Southern Cassowary

Home to endangered species like the Cassowary and the rare Bennet’s Tree Kangaroo the Daintree is the most biodiverse region in Australia and is internationally recognised globally for its breathtaking beauty and striking landscape.

With pristine coastal scenery where rainforests meet white sandy beaches with coral reefs offshore, the region is framed by swift-flowing rivers, spectacular waterfalls, and rugged and iconic mountain peaks and gorges as well as unbroken vistas of tropical forests and valleys.

Despite conservationists successfully lobbying to have 900,000 hectares included as part of the Wet Tropics World Heritage Area in 1998, a subdivision more than a decade earlier of 1100 residential blocks continues to have a detrimental impact. 

This proposal for a bridge will fuel further development.

Thirty-five years since subdivision and there are proposals still being tabled for the development of this ancient ecosystem. Landowners can apply to build dwellings and clear vegetation which directly removes rare and threatened plants and displaces vulnerable animals. The construction of a bridge will have the same impact.

As the current ferry operates under restricted hours, a bridge will increase both the number of vehicles, as well as the hours of the day that they’re on narrow, poorly lit roads. Vehicle strike is a killer of the Southern Cassowary, an endangered species critical to the rainforest’s natural ability to regenerate. The installation of lights or other traffic devices will have an impact on nocturnal animals.

Canopy opening occurs when vegetation is cleared for roads being built or widened and this results in a fragmented habitat, increased light penetration, and more weed species. Expanding the road network will create further edge effects, having an even bigger impact on opening up rainforest canopies. Doing so, then catalyses the spread of pest plants and animals.

The existing ferry crossing the Daintree River

With greater access comes further residential development which in turn creates increased pressure for services such as electricity, mobile phone towers, and sealing of dirt roads.

This infrastructure increases the region’s land value which then drives further development. A bridge will be the catalyst for many changes to the ecosystems so highly valued by residents and tourists alike.  

Tourists are drawn to the Daintree now because of its intact rainforest and genuine wildlife experiences. This proposed bridge will undermine the region’s natural values and put its World Heritage status at risk.

In the previous consultation by Douglas Shire, only 5% of respondents wanted a bridge.

As ratepayers and landowners in the Douglas Shire, Rainforest 4 Foundation is opposed to the construction of a bridge across the Daintree River. And we’re not alone. A coalition of the country’s most significant conservation groups has written to the Federal Government and UNESCO about their concerns. And thousands of people have added their voice to our calls to stop this bridge from going ahead. You can join them by adding your name to our petition.  

Showing 9 reactions

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
  • Carlton Thomas
    commented 2022-07-14 22:21:24 +1000
    The opposition to a bridge crossing in the Daintree makes little sense. If one is worried about it increasing access to the Daintree you can simply increase the price of crossing the bridge. The revenue can be put into preserving the Daintree. There is no reason the bridge crossing should not cost the same if not more than a ferry crossing, this comes with the added benefit that the ferry will not be polluting into the Daintree river. If people are willing to pay $45 for a return ticket via ferry then they are at least willing to pay $45 for a bridge crossing return which takes much less time. If this sees to many people crossing the bridge then increase the price of the fair even more. You could also offer locals a special offer as you can perfectly identify them via their home address.

    If you’re worried about the further development of dwellings lobby to stop them, not something which can help to preserve the Daintree such as a bridge.
  • Karen Furniss
    commented 2022-05-09 22:15:11 +1000
    We must protect and preserve this amazing and unique area!
    Say NO to the Daintree River Bridge.
  • Robert Stephen
    commented 2021-06-19 17:37:20 +1000
    No environment No economy No future!
  • jack lake
    commented 2020-10-20 09:30:32 +1100
    > the locals of the daintree community are very happy with the current river crossing arrangement. a bridge will not be for the benefit of those who live, work or visit. A bridge will become a red carpet to invite all those who are only looking for one thing, which of course not what we all love about the daintree, nothing but a tailor made pocket being lined with capitalist fortunes…
  • jack lake
    followed this page 2020-10-20 09:17:29 +1100
  • Robert bright
    commented 2020-10-17 22:39:59 +1100
    Preserving precious environment essential that any impact needs essential study and review for acceptable sustainable evaluation!! There are very clever people who can combine improvements in transportation without impact or minimal effect to the environment !!
  • Anne McAlpine
    commented 2020-09-26 11:11:49 +1000
    “Jobs and Growth” a disgusting, world destroying way to see how humanity should exsist. Stop this project now please!!
  • Richard Baxter
    followed this page 2020-09-21 18:00:52 +1000
  • Samantha Morris
    published this page in Latest News 2020-09-18 11:38:55 +1000